![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||
|
Dateline ACTSudan 01/01Oil before foodKhartoum
& Kadugli, April 2001 War, drought and reckless
oil exploitation threaten the lives of millions of people in Sudan.
Vanessa Gordon meets victims of the war, watches oil money bubble in
Khartoum and discovers some tough dilemmas confronting those who want
to help Two ragged women fall behind
the small group of visiting aid workers and government officials. Once
out of reach of prying ears they spit it out in a quick whisper: "We
had no choice but to come here. Once the government had beaten back
the rebels, the soldiers torched all our food, the fields and our huts.
Then they told us to walk here." Nervous government officials
once again gather the group of visitors and lead the way further up
the small hillside where some 130 families of the Nuba people build
new homes. By chance, the group walk past a girl of some two years with
extensive and untreated burn wounds on her left arm and elbow. "What happened to her?"
someone asks. The answer comes promptly and without consulting the girl’s
mother: "She was wounded in the crossfire with the rebels."
An awkward embarrassment comes over the party as the officials usher
their guests on. "We all love Yousif!"
whispers a local priest at another chance encounter outside reach of
the otherwise tight government security arrangement surrounding this
rare visit of foreigners to the Nuba Mountains. "Yousif " is shorthand
for Yousif Kuwa, the seriously ill rebel commander of the Nuba branch
of the Sudan Peoples Liberation Army (SPLA). Since the late 1980’s Yousif
Kuwa has spearheaded a popular revolt in the inaccessible mountains
and he is arguably the most popular SPLA commander in all of the rebel-controlled
parts of Sudan. Just weeks after this conversation took place, Yuosif
Kuwa died from his illness. Commander Kua’s popularity
could appear astonishing when considering that the war in the Nuba Mountains
has led to some of the worst civilian suffering in the continuing Hell-hole
which is Sudan’s civil war. But if anything, the government’s scorched
earth warfare has only added to the old animosity between the Nuba people
and the central authorities in the capital Khartoum. The civil war, the second
since Sudan’s independence in 1956, started in 1983 when southern Sudanese
revolted against a political weakening of the south and against the
introduction of Islamic laws (Sharia). In 1984 foreign oil workers
fled Upper Nile as attacks by SPLA made life and work there impossible.
For almost 15 years the oil remained untouched but in 1999, with the
completion of a pipeline from Upper Nile to Port Sudan on the Red Sea,
oil exploration reappeared as a major issue in the war. Oil before food It’s the very pipeline, which
shunts oil from the newly developed oilfields south of the mountains
to its destination in northern Sudan. The pipeline, marked every 500
meters by yellow or red warning signs, is buried under a low vault of
earth changing from black to dusty red as it ploughs through different
soil types. Whatever it’s colour, the pipeline is watched over by military
check points every five km with additional mobile units walking up and
down the road at all times. This pipeline – running an
amazing 1,600 kilometre - is the vulnerable main artery of the Sudanese
government’s newly found riches and rebels must be kept away from it
at any cost. As the war continues in the
mountains, aid workers and local leaders in lower lying towns such as
Kadugli and Dilling expect a continued influx of displaced people from
the war zones. Government forces are on the offensive and seem bend
on extending the security perimeter around the pipeline and access roads
to the oil operations. Reports from churches and
local authorities in Upper Nile – some 200 km further south of the Nuba
Mountains and in the oil areas – confirm that they need assistance for
some 60,000 people displaced by continued fighting in the area. The last couple of years
the Sudanese army and allied militias have been waging a savage war
in Upper Nile, leaving the areas around oil installations and supply
roads virtually empty of the original population. Hundreds have been
killed in attacks on civilian villages. Tens of thousands have been
forced to flee their homesteads. In some of the worst documented cases,
children, women and elderly have been burned alive, trapped inside their
huts as they were torched by army and militia soldiers. Oil induced misery Starved and displaced, the
legitimate owners of this oil rich land are at the mercy of the bush
and the occasional relief agency. In a camp for displaced not
far from the Nuba mountains, an angry chief cannot hold his tongue:
"What kind of a life is this. We were forced to flee our land and
now we just sit here waiting. Waiting for what? And even here the Arabs
(local slang for northern Sudanese) snatch our young boys for their
militias and send them off to die in a war against their own brothers." The chief, a tall man of
maybe 50 years, speaks with a booming anger and backs his words up with
hefty punches in the air. The eyes are red and bloodshot and his breath
reveals the source of some of this unusual courage in the face of high
ranking security personnel – several glasses of a cheap local brew.
But his anger and indignation should not be dismissed as just a drunkard’s
ravings – the brew only helps him state what others fear to even whisper. Oiling peace, fueling
war At the end of March, the
UN's Human Rights Raporteur for Sudan, Gerhart Baum returned from a
visit to Sudan and reported that "I gathered further evidence that oil
exploitation leads to an exacerbation of the conflict with serious consequences
on civilians". Churches and rights organisations
have launched a campaign to hold companies in countries like the UK,
Sweden and Canada accountable for their involvement in the Sudanese
oilfields. Other major foreign players include Chinese and Malaysian
companies as well as British and German suppliers of pipelines, pump
stations and other essential equipment. Among the allegations against
companies such as Sweden’s Lundin Oil or Canada’s Talisman Energy are
eyewitness accounts to the effect that oil company roads and airfields
are being used by government forces when they attack people living in
the oil areas. The Sudanese government and
the foreign companies dismiss the reports of human rights violations
and atrocities tied closely to their activities. Carl Bildt, a former
Swedish prime minister and currently a UN representative to the Balkans,
sits on the board of Lundin Oil. In a March 22 press statement,
Mr. Bildt stated that he was "convinced that the foreign presence and
not least the oil are possibilities for peace and development in Sudan
in the long term." The sweet smell of new
money Traffic in Khartoum seems
to have at least doubled over the last years. Fuel trucks, nowhere to
be seen in the days of hyper inflation and fuel queues in the mid 1990’s,
race up and down main roads supplying sparkling new fuel stations in
the suburbs and in towns down the course of the Nile. On the outskirts of the capital,
homes the size of small hotels and built in lavish Saudi Arabian style,
pop up where once were just sandy dessert. A few Internet cafés
advertise along the road to and from the airport. In the city centre
music from restaurants and computer game shops add a new layer to the
street noise and the frequent prayer calls radiating from an ever increasing
number of minarets and mosques across town. Money has returned to Khartoum
on a scale challenging the times before 1989, when a National Islamic
Front instigated military coup put the current President, Omar al Beshir,
into the old palace down by the Blue Nile Promenade. Something else may be changing
too. The stern faced Islamic Sharia code so vigorously enforced only
a few years ago seems to be slowly giving way to the kind of sneaking
Westernization which comes with the smell of new money and spoiled upper
class kids. Teenage boys have taken to
jeans and untied sneakers as they hang out around Internet cafés
exchanging DVD’s and video copies of the latest American blockbusters.
Their young sisters still cover their heads and torso in traditional
Sudanese tobs but the colours are brighter, the patterns starker
and the tob often only serves to enhance the expressive fashion
statements worn underneath. An uninformed visitor could
almost be excused for thinking that some of the Islamic zealots surrounding
Omar el Beshir are too busy counting their share of the new oil money
to watch over their sons’ and daughters’ moral virtues. The displaced, like 99,9
% of the Sudanese population, live way outside the oil bubble’s posh
mansions, and cannot even dream of ever hanging out in Internet cafés.
Where they live, not even snail mail would reach. Outside the bubble TB, HIV – nobody knows what’s
eating up this woman, but it seems evident that her four children may
soon join the swelling ranks of orphans roaming the streets of Khartoum
in their perpetual search for food and shelter. Here – within half an hour’s
drive from government ministries, the five star hotels of the foreign
oil workers or the offices of UN and other relief agencies – hundreds
of children gather everyday in feeding centres for the most malnourished.
The last time the authorities allowed a nutritional study in the camps
were in 1998, then 12 % of the children were found to be malnourished. Currently local and international
churches co-operate to feed some 4.000 children in several camps. But
donor fatigue and constant obstacles put in place by local authorities
may soon conspire to close down even these projects. By mid-April several
of the feeding centres look set to shut down leaving thousands of mothers
and children with nobody to turn to. Local authorities occasionally
allow aid agencies to offer some minimal services to the camps. On the
other hand, bulldozers are repeatedly sent in to demolish homes or entire
camps with just a few hours notice. The result is that the displaced
continue to be weak, disorganised and constantly on the move. Cheap
labour for the bubble economy. Drought, delays and dilemmas The war in the south is likely
to intensify until the end of this year’s dry season in May. Continued
expulsions of the people living in "promising" oil fields
will prompt further disasters. Lastly a severe drought is spreading
in western, eastern and southern parts of Sudan leaving wells and ponds
dry and pastures yellow-brown. All these factors could conspire
to send large numbers of people migrating for food and safety while
making relief efforts even more difficult than normal in Sudan. The slow donor response to
the crisis in Sudan could have several explanations among them that
major donations often come in with significant delays not only in Sudan
but also in other chronic crisis areas like Ethiopia or Angola. But another factor might
be setting in. The international community has spent billions of dollars
on relief in Sudan since the mid-1980. At the same time the Sudanese
government has continued a war estimated to cost between $ 300 and 400
million per year. International donors and
aid agencies have long been wondering what they are actually doing with
their "humanitarian assistance" in Sudan. Are aid agencies,
while assisting people in need, allowing the government of Sudan and
the rebel SPLA to perpetuate the war unburdened by their obligation
to fend for their own people in need? Off the record many experienced
aid workers volunteer a: "Yes, at least to some extend". But
it is quickly followed up with what is referred to as the "humanitarian
imperative" - or in this case the "humanitarian dilemma": "Do we have a choice?
If we don’t feed the hungry, the government or the SPLA will let them
die. Can you let people die from hunger just because they happen to
be born in the wrong place?" This dilemma is by no means new to
donors and humanitarian workers in Sudan or for that matter a number
of other chronic emergencies across the world. What is new in the Sudanese
context, is the oil money. In 2000, the Sudanese government
suddenly had an estimated extra $ 200 - 300 million oil dollars which
it could plough into an escalation of the war while the same government
expects aid agencies to feed the very people famished by that very war. No wonder if donors are increasingly
weary of "picking up the bill" from Sudan’s seemingly endless
civil war. A similar dilemma confronted
international donors in Ethiopia and Eritrea last year, when a drought
put millions of lives at risk just as these two countries were engaged
in a costly border war. To some extend donors tried to hold off from
funding humanitarian work there, arguing that if Ethiopia and Eritrea
would put an end to the war, the hunger could be managed with much less
outside assistance. That position, rational as
it appeared on one level, held up only until a series of grim and emotive
television pictures flickered across screens in Europe and North America
and public pressure pushed donors and aid agencies into rapid action. Come June or July this year,
a similar series of events could be repeated – only this time the images
of starving children will not come from Gode in Ethiopia but from villages
in southern and western Sudan. Vanessa Gordon has covered
events in Sudan for more than a decade. She just returned from a visit
to government controlled parts of the country. Photo: Vanessa Gordon/ACT
International The points of view presented
in this article are those of the author and not official positions of
ACT or its membership.
|
|||||||||||